-
Healthcare
-

Maternity Reconfiguration Cannot Wait for Political Comfort

By
Distilled Post Editorial Team

A woman in labour in Barnstaple now faces 43 miles and about 70 minutes in a car to reach a maternity unit in Exeter. The unit at North Devon district hospital closed temporarily in August because it lacked enough doctors, and an estimated 194 women have since given birth elsewhere. The prime minister has described the situation as unacceptable, while a senior NHS leader has suggested that north Devon offers an early indication of what lies ahead.

Matthew Hopkins, acute care director at the NHS Alliance, says as many as 20 of England's 155 consultant-led units will need to shut or change function. Units delivering 1,500 to 2,000 babies a year struggle to recruit obstetricians, and the rural and coastal sites hardest to staff are the most exposed. The royal colleges answered quickly, insisting that care should stay close to home and that safer workforce solutions exist. Those objections deserve a hearing. They also have to be set against what has already happened. Yeovil's unit was closed for almost 12 months before reopening this year. In Newry, Daisy Hill has been earmarked for closure after recruitment efforts in Ireland, the UK and overseas came to nothing.

The debate over whether to centralise is therefore partly settled by events. Temporary closures forced by rota gaps amount to reconfiguration by attrition, decided by whichever unit runs out of doctors first. Planned consolidation at least allows investment where women will actually be sent, in neonatal capacity, ambulance cover and theatre staffing, and gives families a clear picture of what to expect.

The caesarean rate gives the issue its urgency. Caesareans rose from 33 per cent of births in England in 2020 to 45 per cent last year. Each one needs an obstetric surgeon, an anaesthetist, a theatre and recovery staff, so a unit designed for a world where two thirds of births were vaginal is now running on outdated assumptions. The latest confidential enquiry into maternal deaths found that some women who died between 2022 and 2024 had their caesarean delayed or postponed because a surgeon or theatre was unavailable. Hopkins warns that a rate of 55 or 65 per cent would force reactive decisions on the service. Nobody can say with confidence where the rate will settle, which is a reason to plan for a range.

Politics explains why the planning has not happened. Valerie Amos's review in June recorded senior figures describing unsafe estates and too little political backing for difficult reconfiguration decisions. Anyone who has watched a hospital campaign unfold will recognise the pattern. A local MP defends the unit, a petition gathers tens of thousands of names, and a decision that clinicians regard as overdue slips by another year. Trust leaders carry the blame for choices that properly belong to ministers.

The government says maternity is a personal priority of the Secretary of State and that a national taskforce, due to report before Christmas, will deliver reform. Hospital bosses fear the report will be tokenistic. Their concern is specific. If the taskforce does not set out how the NHS accommodates the surge in caesareans, with the staff and operating capacity that implies, it will have sidestepped the operational question that matters most.

The practical implications are fairly clear. NHS leaders need national clinical criteria for which units can safely remain consultant-led, so that individual trusts are not left to justify closures alone. Policymakers need to pair any consolidation with funded transport, published travel-time standards and a frank account of the risks that longer journeys carry, especially in rural Devon and on the coast. Workforce planners need to address the shortage of obstetricians and anaesthetists directly, since a reconfigured map still needs the people to staff it.

Families in north Devon are already living with the cost of delay. A government that claims maternity as a priority will be judged on whether it names the units at risk, defends the criteria and takes the argument to the communities affected. Proximity and staffing cannot always be delivered by the same building. Ministers will have to decide which they can guarantee, and say so before the next rota gap decides for them.

‍