-
Healthcare
-

NHS Trust Faces Enforcement Action After Doctors Warn Of Patient Safety Crisis

By
Distilled Post Editorial Team

NHS England has taken formal enforcement action against Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust following months of unrest among clinical and administrative staff over patient safety. The trust, which operates four hospitals across Greater Manchester, now faces potential fines or the loss of its operating licence if it cannot demonstrate adequate improvement to regulators.

Northern Care Alliance was formed in 2021 through a merger of Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust and The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust. Salford Royal had long held a strong reputation for clinical standards, making the trust's current position a marked departure from where it stood only a few years ago.

The deterioration became visible in November 2025, when dozens of consultants gathered at a meeting to document their concerns formally. They described ward conditions as resembling war zones, pointed to chronic understaffing, last-minute surgical cancellations, and said the organisation's culture had become fearful and designed to silence dissent. A survey conducted among around 426 consultants found that more than 200 had lost confidence in the trust's leadership. More than a third said they did not believe their hospitals were safe. Consultants subsequently wrote to the board, threatening a vote of no confidence in both the chief executive and medical director if the situation did not change within three months.

The unrest was not confined to medical staff. In June 2025, representatives of 14 trade unions submitted a collective grievance on behalf of hundreds of administrative employees. The grievance cited unachievable workloads and backlogs in patient correspondence running to between four and ten weeks. Staff warned that delays in processing letters and investigation results were creating direct risks to patient safety. There was also an allegation that employees had been told to stop submitting safety incident reports because management did not have the capacity to process them.

Industrial action has compounded the pressure on the trust. Critical care nurses walked out twice this year after the trust withdrew their ability to work overtime. Surgical theatre staff are preparing to strike imminently, and the disputes show little sign of resolution despite management assurances.

Owen Williams, the trust's chief executive, announced in April 2026 that he would be stepping down. Several other senior figures have left since. The Care Quality Commission has launched inspections of the gynaecology and surgery departments and is examining whether the organisation is well-led. That review runs alongside NHS England's enforcement process, leaving the trust subject to scrutiny from two regulatory bodies simultaneously.

Rebecca Long-Bailey, the MP for Salford, has called for a formal and transparent review of how the trust handles whistleblowing disclosures. She said staff had told her they did not feel safe raising concerns and that the existing Freedom to Speak Up processes were not working in practice. The trust's gynaecology unit at Salford Royal is already under review following findings that dozens of women, including cancer patients, experienced delayed diagnosis and treatment as a result of administrative failures.

The trust's deputy chief delivery officer, Sarah Hall, said this week that patient safety remained the organisation's highest priority and that measures were being put in place to address staff concerns. The trust's interim executives issued a communication to staff saying they were committed to putting things right.

Those words have not landed well with clinical staff. One doctor described the mood as one of anger and disbelief, saying that the same leadership figures who oversaw years of underfunding and understaffing were now circulating messages acknowledging regulatory concern while theatre staff finalised plans to strike. Whether the enforcement action from NHS England will produce the structural changes that consultants and unions have been demanding for months remains, at this point, an open question.