.jpg)
.jpg)
NHS England has raised its technology and innovation risk score from 8 to 12, citing difficulties in deploying complex systems and in turning strategic plans into clinical practice across the health service.
The increase was recorded by the national board, which linked it to slower-than-expected progress on several flagship programmes. These include the Federated Data Platform, the NHS App, the single patient record and ambient voice technology. Board papers attribute the delays mainly to limited implementation capacity among local providers. Financial pressures, recruitment difficulties and regulatory approval processes inside the organisation have added further friction.
Cyber security keeps the highest score on the national risk register, at the maximum of 25. A large number of healthcare organisations still fail to meet the standards set by the Data and Security Protection Toolkit. NHS England is responding through its Cyber Improvement Programme and a national cyber strategy that runs to 2030.
Board members also raised the lack of a coherent national vision for artificial intelligence. Without one, they warned, separate teams are duplicating work and deployment is lagging. The board asked for governance that is proportionate and based on risk, covering the safety of AI tools from development through to everyday use.
National leaders told the board that digital tools should be built into wider operational reforms rather than managed as standalone IT projects. The 10 Year Workforce Plan and the Urgent and Emergency Care strategies were named as the main vehicles. Under this approach, technology is treated as a working part of service change, and its success is measured by what it does for staff and patients.
The papers also set out a proposed division of responsibilities. The central authority would take a stronger role in strategy, standards, common platforms and national infrastructure. Local providers would keep control over how care pathways are redesigned. Regional bodies and Integrated Care Boards are expected to adjust their functions as the government's devolution policies develop.
A separate item concerns genomics. Following a directive from the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, NHS England is building an IT system for the Genomics Order Management Service. It will replace manual processing with digital tracking from start to finish, handle the ordering of genetic tests, and act as a central broker of data between laboratories.
Several consultations and funding announcements were noted alongside the risk discussion. The National Data Guardian has launched a survey of practitioners to identify workflow obstacles and gauge clinician trust before the national single patient record is introduced. Responses are intended to shape how the record is rolled out in practice.
NHS England has also opened an anonymous staff engagement exercise across the system to inform the action plan of the National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce. The taskforce was set up after recent public inquiries into maternity care, and the exercise seeks the views of those working in services.
The Department of Health and Social Care has allocated £1.5 million to six local pilot sites under the Neighbourhood Health Trailblazers scheme. The sites will test integrated models of community care delivered outside hospitals. The pilots aim to address population health needs and reduce health inequalities, and their results will inform wider plans for neighbourhood services.
The higher risk score does not signal a change in the direction of the digital programme. It does record that the gap between national ambition and local ability to deliver is wider than the board had assumed. How quickly that gap narrows will depend on funding for local providers, the speed of regulatory approvals and whether a national approach to AI emerges. The board is expected to review the score at its next scheduled risk assessment.