NHS England has issued its first-ever "red" rating for leadership capability to an NHS trust, following a governance collapse that ended with the resignation of the institution's chair. The sanction against East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust comes after a trust that has spent much of the past decade in crisis lost its chair to a boardroom dispute investigators said should never have occurred.

The sequence of events began when Annette Doherty, the trust's chair, attempted to suspend chief executive Tracey Fletcher during a mid-year performance review. According to accounts of the incident, Ms Fletcher was given fewer than 24 hours to accept a settlement or face suspension. The suspension was initially carried out, but Ms Fletcher challenged it through formal grievance procedures.

An independent investigation found that Ms Doherty had exceeded her authority. NHS governance frameworks require board consensus before removing a chief executive. Investigators concluded the process did not meet that standard, and that Ms Doherty's conduct fell short of the expectations placed on senior NHS leaders. Following those findings, she resigned.

NHS England responded by downgrading the trust's capability rating to red. The designation is not a routine performance measure. It signals that the regulator no longer has confidence in the leadership's ability to govern the organisation without intensive external support. No NHS trust in England has received this rating before.

The timing is particularly damaging for East Kent. The trust has been in the national spotlight since the 2022 Kirkup Inquiry, which concluded that dozens of deaths of mothers and babies at the trust were avoidable and that serious failings in maternity care went unaddressed for years. The inquiry prompted commitments to rebuild governance and restore patient safety. This latest episode raises questions about how far that work has progressed.

The departure of Ms Doherty is the fourth change of chairmanship at the trust in five years. That pattern of instability at the top has made it difficult to sustain leadership continuity and, by extension, a coherent improvement programme. Repeated turnover in the boardroom is rarely incidental. It tends to reflect either a dysfunctional governance culture or a trust caught between competing pressures it has not found a way to resolve. In East Kent's case, there is evidence for both.

NHS England has indicated it will conduct a wider review of board governance at the trust to establish how a breach of this kind was able to occur. An interim chair will be appointed while a permanent successor is found. The trust has confirmed it remains committed to its recovery plan, though what that plan can realistically deliver without stable leadership at the top remains uncertain.

The red rating places East Kent in a category of its own and obliges NHS England to take a more direct role in overseeing how the trust is run, with conditions attached that the board has not previously faced.

The Kirkup Inquiry found systemic failures that cost lives. Five years on, the trust is still cycling through chairs and has now triggered a regulatory response without precedent in the health service. Progress on patient safety requires stable, accountable leadership. East Kent does not yet have it.

‍