.png)
.png)
The British Medical Association suspended a planned five-day strike by resident doctors in England hours before it was due to begin on Monday, after the government put forward a revised pay and conditions offer late on Saturday night. The walkout, which had been scheduled to run from 15 to 19 June, would have been the sixteenth round of industrial action since 2023.
The offer, which will now go to a member ballot in the coming weeks, covers pay, specialty training posts and contract terms for locally employed doctors. Whether it ends the dispute depends entirely on how tens of thousands of frontline doctors vote.
Under the proposal, resident doctors would receive an average pay uplift of 6.6 per cent by April 2027, achieved through faster reform of pay nodal points and twice-yearly increases tied to career progression. A further uplift is expected the following April, in line with the next Doctors' and Dentists' Review Body recommendation. The government has also committed to 4,500 specialty training places over three years, addressing the career bottleneck that has blocked thousands of doctors from progressing after completing their foundation training. All locally employed doctors would be brought onto the terms of the standard 2016 resident doctor contract, and exam, portfolio and membership fees would be covered by the employer.
The offer's employment component has generated controversy. Doctors rejected the government's March proposal for 4,500 training spots before going on a six-day strike during Easter. Given that almost 20,000 doctors have been excluded from speciality training this year alone, critics in the field contend that the amount is much below what is required.
On pay, the government's position has shifted. Health Secretary Wes Streeting spent much of last year insisting the 5.4 per cent award for 2025/26 was settled and non-negotiable. The new Health Secretary, James Murray, has moved beyond that position, though the government maintains that resident doctors have already received cumulative pay rises of around 33 per cent over four years. The BMA disputes that framing, arguing that real-terms pay remains approximately 20 per cent below 2008 levels once inflation is factored in. Although they measure distinct things, both values are accurate.
Dr Jack Fletcher, chair of the BMA's Resident Doctors Committee, acknowledged the offer was worth putting to members but did not conceal his frustration at the timing."This should not have been left to the last moment," he stated, "but we hold up our end of the bargain when the Government shifts its position." He was clear about what would happen if the vote was unsuccessful: the current strike mandate would remain legally in effect and there would be more intense action in July.
Murray, for his part, called the suspension of strikes a positive development, particularly for patients, and said he expected the committee to recommend members vote in favour. He described the deal as good for pay, career prospects and working conditions. Whether the membership agrees is another question.
Some disruption will still be felt this week. NHS England said around 95 per cent of planned operations and appointments would proceed, but thousands of procedures had already been cancelled or moved in anticipation of the strike. Over 1.5 million appointments and treatments have been rescheduled throughout England since the conflict started in 2023, costing the health sector billions of dollars.
Hospital trusts had been making contingency preparations for what would have been a difficult week, arriving as it did during the summer period and coinciding with additional seasonal pressures. That pressure has not disappeared; it has simply been deferred while doctors decide.
A referendum date has not been confirmed. If members vote to accept, the dispute ends. If they do not, July will bring another set of strike dates and the cycle resumes.