-
Healthcare
-

Burnham's Makerfield Win Reopens the Health Devolution Question as Labour Leadership Race Looms

By
Distilled Post Editorial Team

Andy Burnham's decisive win in the Makerfield by-election does more than open a path back to the House of Commons. It puts the country's most prominent advocate of health and social care devolution within reach of the top job in government, at a moment when his own integration model in Greater Manchester is only weeks into a new phase of expansion.

Burnham took 24,927 votes in Thursday's contest, around 55 per cent of the vote, beating Reform UK's Robert Kenyon by roughly twenty percentage points. Turnout rose to 58.8 per cent. The seat had been held by Josh Simons, who resigned in May specifically so that Burnham, a former health secretary, could regain the Commons seat needed to qualify for a Labour leadership contest.

For those working in or alongside the NHS, Burnham's record is well established. He served as health secretary under Gordon Brown from 2009 to 2010, and since becoming mayor of Greater Manchester in 2017 has co-chaired the NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership, building on the city-region's pioneering 2015 health and social care devolution deal. He has used the role to argue for fuller integration of the two systems, including handing day-to-day running of social care to the NHS, and has previously warned against insurance-style social care models on the grounds that separating funding streams works against integration.

That agenda gained fresh momentum in March, when the Department of Health and Social Care announced new devolution trials for Greater Manchester and South Yorkshire, building on prevention demonstrator status for the two areas. Announcing the deals, the then health secretary Wes Streeting said the new integrated care board chairs would in effect become "deputy mayors for health", working alongside Burnham and South Yorkshire's Oliver Coppard. Streeting credited both mayors with placing public health at the centre of their regions in a way Whitehall could not match.

Streeting himself resigned as health secretary on 14 May, telling Starmer he had lost confidence in his leadership. The departure came as government figures showed NHS waiting lists had fallen by 110,000 in March, the largest monthly drop outside the pandemic since 2008, a record Streeting pointed to as evidence Labour was on track for the fastest improvement in NHS waiting times in its history. He was replaced by James Murray, previously chief secretary to the Treasury, who has no prior health portfolio experience.

Burnham's win now raises two immediate questions for the sector. The first is structural: taking his Commons seat requires him to resign as Greater Manchester mayor, triggering a fresh mayoral election and leaving open who continues co-chairing the region's integrated care partnership at an early and sensitive stage of its expanded devolution remit. The second is about direction. Should Burnham go on to challenge Starmer for the leadership, NHS and social care leaders would be watching a contest between two contrasting templates for reform, Burnham's preference for devolved, locally led integration against a more centrally driven, target-focused approach associated with Streeting's tenure, now overseen instead by a Treasury-trained successor still finding his feet in the brief.

Whitehall officials and integrated care system leaders alike are likely to spend the coming weeks watching not just whether Burnham challenges the leadership, but what continuity, or disruption, his departure from the mayoralty means for a devolution programme that was only just beginning to widen beyond Greater Manchester's borders.